Thousand Acre Church

Rethinking the Domain of the Church

Thousand Acre Church header image 2

Love and Heresy and The Shack

January 13th, 2009 · 3 Comments

Shack-Shack-Bo-Back-Banana-Fana-Fo-Fack!!!! FACK! I got to admit… I like to think “I’m too cool for school.” (as Zoolander puts it) when it comes to trendy books that get passed around churches. The Prayer of Jabez? HA!! Never touched it! Please. The Purpose Driven Life? Whatever! (see my last post on “Whatever,God!”, okay I read that book, but only b/c the small group I was leading wanted to read it together… apparently I wasn’t REALLY leading that small group, huh?) Soooooooo… when I was told that we HAD to read The Shack in order to participate in the discussion we’re having about it in our Sunday school class, I cringed. My business coach gave Ang and I a copy several months ago… she bought a box of ‘em and was passing them out to friends and strangers alike. She’s not the type that would do that flippantly, so I should have given it more thought at the time; but it went on the shelf. Luckily, now that it was resurfacing in our class, I found it on iTunes in an unabridged format for $5.95. I listened to all 8+ hrs. of it during work last week. Now, I’m ready to admit I enjoyed it.

There were a few things that I thought were distracting, especially the way the older white male narrator on the audio changed his dialect when speaking Papa’s lines. Makes me shiver to think of it again. I was most intrigued by all of the “heresy” buzz. It was mentioned in class that there were several websites we might be discussing that discussed the heresies found in the book (Google “13 heresies of the Shack“). There are (as of right now) 2313 reviews on Amazon… a few hundred of them are not so flattering. It’s interesting to hear the author respond to accusations of “heresy” in interviews because, it seems, he couldn’t care less.

William “Paul” Young wrote the book for an audience of about six people as a favor to his wife. She had been asking him to write down his thoughts on life and theology because she thought they were unique, and she wanted their children to profit from having their father’s thoughts on paper. The deadline for the first edition was to make it to Kinko’s by Christmas so that he could present the book to his children as a gift. The book got passed around, and eventually he started getting calls from people who wanted to get more copies, meet Mack, make a movie, etc. After it was given as a gift to his children, the author had no ambitions or agenda. Interestingly, several folks out there feel an obligation to save the rest of us mindless sheep from buying in to the doctrinal garbage hiding in the belly of this literary Trojan horse. Personally, I’m amused (sorry if that sounds condescending) by the whole response.

I’ve found it easier to let the guardians of truth and virtue in the church (sarcasm intended there) to speak freely and limit my response in these kind of situations. While I’m confident in my ability to articulate a defense of a lot of positions that are considered “out-of-bounds”, I think that too often in these situations I’m living in a different Story… at least I would tell the Story in a different way. The whole discussion seems fruitless, and the exercise of our lips seem to leave us both more entrenched in our commitments and less open to loving one another. Besides that, usually those kind of folks tend to not have time to hang out for long… and it sometimes takes a lot of time and a lot of sharing to articulate our respective versions of the Story. So I just leave it. I think, “You tell your version of the Story of God’s people, I’ll tell mine. We’ll let the proof be in the pudding, eh?” But still… I’m left shrugging at the tendency that a lot of people have to use the word “heresy” to refer to something that they don’t like or that makes them feel uncomfortable. That pattern seems to be repeating with The Shack.

I didn’t really have anything to say about The Shack. Wait, that’s not true. I mean… I have a lot to say, of course, but I’m not sure if the joy of sharing my thoughts on the book is worth all of the misunderstanding and relational tension that would result. Then today, I was listening to a lecture given by N.T. Wright at Regent College on Phillipians 1:1-18. I love that guy, and I love my days doing paperwork that allow me to listen to him in the background. That’s what he was for the most part this morning, background noise. Then I heard him say,

“Note the sequence of what he prays… Love, Knowledge, Insight, Decision, Purity. How often the church has put that sequence some other way ’round. How often the church has taught Knowledge, being able to distinguish truth from heresy, then if you’ve got any time and energy left, stick in a little bit of Love. For Paul, Knowledge and Insight and Discernment flow out of Love.”

I stopped working, listened to it again, and looked it up. Sure enough, it was right there in Phillipians 1:9-11 “And this is my prayer, that your love may overflow more and more with knowledge and full insight to help you to determine what is best, so that in the day of Christ you may be pure and blameless, having produced the harvest of righteousness that comes through Jesus Christ for the glory and praise of God.” Shazam! There it was. Love, love, love! N.T. Wright, in his English accent and wacky sentence structure, said what I was feeling in my gut but couldn’t articulate. It all starts with love! Heresy-schmeresy! Start with love; understanding (if it ever comes) will come behind love.

So The Shack(or any other “fluffy”, liberal, postmodern, emerging, you name it, heretical, etc. book) goes on about love. The guardians of truth and justice (and the American way) go on pushing back that God is holy and just (cause, you know, God certainly must be at least a little pissed off at us so we don’t get too comfortable around him). And me… I’m gonna just try to keep my mouth shut when that conversation happens. I’m gonna use Paul’s prayer from Phillipians 1:9-11, and count on our God, who IS love, and our King Jesus, who embodied compassion and love, to grow our love to overflowing so that we might have a little understanding and insight. Lips zipped. Throw away the key.

Tags: The Shack

3 responses so far ↓

  • 1 13 Heresies of the Shack // Feb 12, 2009 at 9:59 am

    1. God the Father was crucified with Jesus (p96).

    Because God’s eyes are pure and cannot look upon sin, the Bible says that God would not look upon His own beloved Son as He hung on the Cross, carrying our sins (Habakkuk 1:13; Matthew 27:45).

    2. God is limited by His love and cannot practice justice (p102).

    The Bible declares that God’s love and His justice are two sides of the same coin — equally a part of the personality and the character of God (Isaiah 61:8; Hosea 2:19).

    3. On the Cross, God forgave all of humanity, whether they repent or not. Some choose a relationship with Him, but He forgives them all regardless (p225).

    Jesus explained that only those who come to Him will be saved (John 14:6).

    4. Hierarchical structures, whether they are in the Church or in the government, are evil (122).

    Our God is a God of order (Job 25:2).

    5. God will never judge people for their sins (p120).

    The Word of God repeatedly invites people to escape from the judgment of God by believing in Jesus Christ, His Son (Romans 2:16; 2 Timothy 4:1-3).

    6. There is not a hierarchical structure in the Godhead, just a circle of unity (p122).

    The Bible says that Jesus submitted to the will of the Father. This doesn’t mean that one Person is higher or better than the other; just unique. Jesus said, “I came to do the will of Him who sent me. I am here to obey my Father.” Jesus also said, “I will send you the Holy Spirit” (John 4:34, 6:44, 14:26, 15:26).

    7. God submits to human wishes and choices (p145).

    Far from God submitting to us, Jesus said, “Narrow is the way that leads to eternal life.” We are to submit to Him in all things, for His glory and because of what He has accomplished for us (Matthew 7:13-15).

    8. Justice will never take place because of love (p164).

    The Bible teaches that when God’s love is rejected, and when the offer of salvation and forgiveness is rejected, justice must take place or God has sent Jesus Christ to die on the cross for nothing (Matthew 12:20; Romans 3:25-26).

    9. There is no such a thing as eternal judgment or torment in hell (p248).

    Jesus’ own description of hell is vivid … it cannot be denied (Luke 12:5, 16:23).

    10. Jesus is walking with all people in their different journeys to God, and it doesn’t matter which way you get to Him (p182).

    Jesus said, “I am the way, the truth, and the life, and no one will come to the Father but by me” (John 14:6).

    11. Jesus is constantly being transformed along with us (p182).

    Jesus, who dwells in the splendor of heaven, sits at the right hand of God, reigning and ruling the universe. The Bible says, “In Him there is no change, for He is yesterday, today, and forever” (Hebrews 11:12, 13:8; James 1:17).

    12. There is no need for faith or reconciliation with God because everyone will make it to heaven (p122,192).

    Jesus said, “Only those who believe in me will have eternal life” (John 3:15, 3:36, 5:24, 6:40).

    13. The Bible is not true because it reduces God to paper (p65,66,134,198).

    The Bible is God-breathed. Sure, there were many men through 1,800 years who put pen to paper (so to speak), each from different professions and different backgrounds, but the Holy Spirit infused their work with God’s words. These men were writing the same message from Genesis to Revelation. If you want to read more about the place of Christ in the Scripture, read “We Preach Christ” (2 Timothy 3:16).

  • 2 Chad // Feb 12, 2009 at 6:11 pm

    I think this is funny. And I mean that in a fairly disrespectful way. Love is not rude. I’m not sure what prompted anyone to want to cut and paste the whole 13 heresies… But I think its rude. So rude that I just have to laugh and think, “This guy has no idea what he’s doing.” I wonder, sir, if you actually read the post. I did hot link to the “13 heresies” for anyone who wanted to read them. Very discourteous, but I’m not surprised, I guess. Please, sir, feel free to comment on the CONTENT of any post (I can take it)… especially if you’ve read it, but refrain from cut and paste responses. Good times.

  • 3 Wendie // Feb 17, 2009 at 1:35 am

    I appreciate the 13 heresies of the Shack being placed against God’s Word so those with ears to hear have opportunity to see the difference. I personally wish that Mr. Young had simply kept his flawed theology contained within his own family, but becoming heartbroken over yet another man-made fiction attempting to replace sound dcotrine is pointless. It was foretold in scripture that this “falling away” would occur. If the devil can not convince professors of faith to completely ignore God and follow after self interest, he brings about false revival. The worldly, backslidden Church is simply morphing into the lawless, counterfeit Emergent Church. It appears that those who love God and His Word can do little except “come away and be separate.” His true sheep know His true voice and will never follow a stranger’s.